The Romanian Senate adopted a draft law on Tuesday imposing stricter conditions on dog keeping, with 92 senators voting in favor, 2 against, and 7 abstentions. PNL Senator Monica Anisie initiated the legislation, which defines "ill-treatment" and "abuse" of animals and sets specific limits on dog tethering. Permanent dog tethering is now classified as ill-treatment under the draft law.

Tethering a dog for more than two hours within any 24-hour period constitutes ill-treatment. Systems that limit the animal's movement or cause injury are prohibited. The law requires permanent access to potable water and shelter from extreme weather conditions.

Night tethering is banned. Tethering during heatwaves or frost is prohibited. Puppies under six months old cannot be tethered.

Temporary tethering is permitted only in justified situations. When tethering is allowed, systems must enable free animal movement and measure at least three meters in length. An appropriate collar or harness is required to prevent injury.

The draft law expands the definition of "ill-treatment" to include brutal behavior towards animals, abuse in animal use, and subjecting animals to unnecessary effort. Failing to ensure minimum legal conditions for animal care also qualifies as ill-treatment. Sanctions for non-compliance follow a gradual structure.

For first violations, competent authorities will order remedial measures with a compliance term not exceeding 24 hours. Failure to comply with these measures triggers contraventional sanctions. Repeated non-compliance can lead to animal confiscation.

The draft law is not yet enacted. It now moves to the Chamber of Deputies, the decisional body in Romania's legislative process. If approved there and promulgated, the law will take effect 12 months after publication in the Official Monitor.

The legislation addresses tethering systems in detail. Systems must allow free movement and cannot restrict the animal's natural range of motion. Length requirements ensure dogs have adequate space.

Băile Felix festival brings 155 young voices together, including Romanian children from Italy

Buzău mayor Toma quits two PSD leadership roles after councilors block his projects

The three-meter minimum applies to all temporary tethering situations where such restraint is justified. Access to water must be permanent, not periodic. Shelter requirements cover both heat and cold extremes.

The law does not specify shelter dimensions but mandates protection from extreme weather conditions. The prohibition on night tethering applies regardless of duration. The two-hour limit applies to daytime tethering.

These provisions create a framework where extended restraint becomes legally actionable. Brutal behavior, a component of the expanded ill-treatment definition, covers physical acts against animals. Abuse in animal use addresses exploitation beyond reasonable working or service expectations.

Unnecessary effort refers to demands placed on animals that exceed their physical capacity or serve no legitimate purpose. The 24-hour compliance window for remedial measures gives owners a brief period to correct violations before facing sanctions. Competent authorities determine what remedial measures are necessary based on the specific violation.

The law does not detail which authorities hold enforcement responsibility. Confiscation as a penalty for repeated non-compliance represents the most severe consequence in the sanctions structure. The draft law does not specify how many violations constitute "repeated" non-compliance or what happens to confiscated animals.

The Senate vote showed strong support, with opposition limited to two senators. Seven abstentions suggest some hesitation, though the reasons for abstaining are not specified in the legislative record. Minimum legal conditions for animal care, referenced in the ill-treatment definition, likely draw from existing animal welfare regulations.

The draft law does not enumerate these conditions but incorporates them by reference into the ill-treatment framework. The 12-month implementation delay, if the law is enacted, allows time for public education and preparation. Owners will need to modify existing tethering practices to comply with the new standards.

The delay also gives authorities time to establish enforcement procedures. The Chamber of Deputies will determine whether the draft law becomes binding legislation. As the decisional body, its approval is required for the law to advance to promulgation.